Insect farming in Thailand

While insect consumption is somewhat of a novelty in the west, it has actually been a part of human cuisine for a long time, especially in Africa, Asia, and Northern America. And in Thailand specifically, insect consumption still plays a major part in everyday nutrition. As such there are more than 20000 registered insect farming enterprises, in Thailand. In the past insects were considered food for the poor, however, in the past decades, that notion has become outdated, and insects have become an affordable, nutritious and variable meal or snack.

A lot of insects are simply gathered from the wild, such as grasshoppers, bamboo caterpillars, silkworms, water scavenger beetles and others. While a few insects are properly reared in facilities, most common are crickets and palm weevil larvae. With crickets being more widespread in the north, and weevils in the south.

Commonly marketed and consumed edible insects in Thailand: (a) grasshoppers, (b) bamboo caterpillars, (c) house crickets, (d) weaver ants, (e) silkworm pupae and (f) water scavenger beetles

Initially, most farms were small-scale, private tanks, now however they are all medium to large-scale industries, either as a result of a community cooperative or a commercial endeavour. Now with 20000 farms operating more than 200000 rearing pens the annual production is measured at around 7500 tonnes.

Commonly farmed species: (a) common cricket, (b) house cricket, (c) palm weevil larvae and (d) mealworm

Cricket farming

Proper cricket farming initially started in Thailand in 1998, the technology was developed at Khon Kaen University and then introduced to farmers and communities all over the country, quickly gaining popularity and acceptance.

Initially, three common native cricket species were used (Gryllus bimaculatus DeGeer, Teleogryllus testaceus Walker and T. occipitalis (Serville)), however eventually they were mostly replaced by the house cricket (Acheta domesticus) due to it’s preferred taste. Cricket rearing is relatively easy, eggs are placed in sand or similar substrate and after hatching the growing crickets are held in a variety of pens. Where they are generally fed chicken feed and a combination of fruit and vegetables. Once they are ready to harvest, they are simply gathered by hand and either thrown in water bags or frozen.

Types of breeding containers: (a) concrete cylinder, (b) concrete block, (c) plywood box and (d) plastic drawers

From large-scale farms, the crickets are usually sold to wholesale buyers, or sometimes directly to consumers or for feed. After one cycle (45 days) farmers can expect a net profit of 50%. A medium-sized farm, producing 500 to 750 kg of crickets can expect a revenue of THB 30000 (816.77 euro1) to 70000 (1905.80), and THB 150000 (4083.86 euro) to 350000 (9529.01) per year if four to five harvesting cycles are involved. Large-scale farms can produce up to 2 tonnes of crickets per harvest cycle.

1as of August 2022

Of course, as with all industries, certain threats can arise with cricket farming.

The high price of protein feed can make up almost half of production costs, making the industry vulnerable to chicken feed prices. And research is required for better feed alternatives.

Disease problems are fairly rare amongst crickets, but undoubtedly with the high population density in rearing facilities and the consequences of human intervention, diseases, infections or contamination of some kind are likely to arise. Meaning that vigilance is always required throughout the whole industrial process.

Palm weevil farming

The Palm weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier) has been farmed for home use by locals of southeast Thailand since 1996, and later become popular and spread around 2005. Data on palm weevil farming is limited, it is only known that in 2011 120 farmers produces 43 tonnes of palm weevil larvae using 4289 rearing basins. The insect’s life-cycle is very reliant on the lan phru tree, and as such currently cannot spread to regions where the tree is absent, and industrial production is also limited as a result.

Traditionally rearing is done directly in palm trunks or stems, which serve as both feed and housing. Several pairs of female and male adults are placed into drilled holes and then sealed, only water is applied twice a day and after 40 to 45 days the larvae can be harvested with a yield of approximately 2 kg per trunk.

A more modernized method utilizes large plastic containers with ground palm stalks and pig feed. With this method after 25 to 30 days each container produces 1-2 kg of larvae.

(a) palm weevil larvae, (b) palm weevil adults, (c) plastic containers for breeding, (d) sago palm stem breeding and (e-f) solid and liquid fertilizers from larvae waste

The net profit of the traditional method, with an average of 350 to 400 trunks used, per harvesting cycle is around THB 143000 (3893.28 euro) – 164000 (4465.02). While the basin method has a net profit of around THB 84000 (2286.96 euro)- 126000 (3430.44) from 200 – 300 basins. The higher profit of the traditional method is due to the lack of feed cost and the ability to reuse trunks, this however does come at the cost of cut down trees.

The reliance on the plan phru tree is a clear limitation on farming, and since the traditional method is more profitable and easier to carry out, the number of palm trees is steadily declining, prompting a need for either a feed alternative or limitations on traditional farming methods.

Insect farming is a very large industry in Thailand, and while it may still need development in certain areas, it is a prime example that insect farming is a promising industry that deserves to be looked into and developed.

References:

  • Hanboonsong, Y., Rattanapan, A., Waikakul, Y. & Liwavanich, A. 2001. Edible insect survey in Northeastern Thailand. Khon Kaen Agriculture Journal, 29(1): 35-44. (In Thai.)
  • Halloran, A., Hanboonsong, Y., Roos, N. and Bruun, S. (2017) ‘Life cycle assessment of cricket farming 617 in north-eastern Thailand’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 156, 83-94.
  • Reverberi, M. (2020) ‘Edible insects: Cricket farming and processing as an emerging market’, Journal of Insects as Food and Feed, 6(2), 211 -220.

Growing protein at home

Human beings need at the very least 0.8 g of protein per kg of body weight every day to function and 1.0 to 1.6 g per kg of body weight to maintain a healthy state. For many people, this protein requirement comes from eating meat.

Unfortunately the production of beef, pork, poultry and other commonly eaten meat results in a fairly large environmental impact. Globally the Green House Gas emissions contribution by the animal sector are: 9% for CO2, 35-40% for CH4, and 65% for N2O. This was calculated with the whole production process taken into account.

The introduction of mini-livestock has been proposed as one of many ways to decrease global emissions. This involves individual households rearing small animals such as ruminants, poultry, insects etc for protein. Research suggests that insects are significantly more environmentally friendly than conventional meat while being nutritionally equal. With this in mind an Austrian design company, L I V I N, has developed a miniature Black Soldier Fly farm, the Farm 432.

Farm 432 by L I V I N

Black soldier flies (Hermetia illucens) are insects of the order Diptera, are medium-sized (adult 16 millimetres (58 in) long) fairly widespread flies that are completely harmless to humans. But their true value lies in their larval stage. Black soldier fly larvae are well known to be highly efficient decomposers, being able to not only turn food waste into biomass, but also reduce the microbial count of the substrate, and prevent other insects from utilizing it.

Black Soldier Fly life cycle
Inside farm 432

Adult BSF (Black Soldier Flies) can survive on just honey water, making their upkeep very easy in the large dome where they can fly and mate. Once the female is ready, she will lay eggs in one of the holes as it leads to the waste container. The larvae will then grow on whatever waste is provided, such as food scraps, cooking waste, and spoilt food. BSF larvae are known for a phenomenon called “self-harvesting” – as part of their natural life-cycle, the larvae will try to find an elevated position to pupate. Utilizing this behaviour, farm 432 has a ladder leading to the harvest drawer where they can later be gathered and either reintroduced to the farm to continue the cycle or be eaten.

The farm’s creators say that after 432 hours, 1 gram of black soldier fly eggs turns into 2.4 kilograms of larvae protein.

Devices like these show a glimpse of a potential future where each household has its own miniature insect farm that’s fed exclusively on household bio-waste, leading to increased green self-sufficiency.

References:

  • Beets WC (1997) The need for an increased use of small and mini -livestock in integrated smallholder farming systems. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 36: 237–245.
  • Green, T.R. and Popa, R. (2012) ‘Enhanced ammonia content in compost leachate processed by black soldier fly larvae’, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 166(6), 1381-1387.
  • Gullan PJ, Cranston PS (2005) The insects: an outline of entomology: Blackwell Publishing. pp 10–20.
  • Nakagaki BJ, DeFoliart GR (1991) Comparison of diets for mass-rearing Acheta domesticus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae) as a novelty food, and comparison of food conversion efficiency with values reported for livestock. Journal of Economic Entomology 84: 891–896.
  • Oonincx, D.G., Van Itterbeeck, J., Heetkamp, M.J., Van Den Brand, H., Van Loon, J.J. and Van Huis, A. (2010) ‘An exploration on greenhouse gas and ammonia production by insect species suitable for animal or human consumption’, PloS one, 5(12), e14445.
  • Ramos-Elorduy J (2008) Energy supplied by edible insects from Mexico and their nutritional and ecological importance. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 47: 280–297.
  • Sheppard, C. (1983) ‘House fly and lesser fly control utilizing the black soldier fly in manure management systems for caged laying hens’, Environmental entomology, 12(5), 1439-1442.
  • Zheng, L., Hou, Y., Li, W., Yang, S., Li, Q. and Yu, Z. (2012) ‘Biodiesel production from rice straw and restaurant waste employing black soldier fly assisted by microbes’, Energy, 47(1), 225-229.

Could working from home be better for the environment in the long term

During the Covid-19 pandemic in order to halt the spread of the virus, many countries enacted a lockdown, which forced millions of people to work from home rather than in their offices, studios, etc. Other than halting the spread of the virus and unfortunately greatly impacting the mental health of people as well as the economy, the lockdown has given interesting consequences and allowed for researching the unique situation from different angles.

Before the pandemic working from home was not that common, mostly it was done in households that create their own produce, such as farms or crafters.

Percentage of workers that were home-based (all employment statuses) prior to pandemic

During the pandemic, however, the percentage of people working from home rose drastically, reaching up to even 90% in some places, although not many countries were capable of reaching such a number.

One of the consequences of so many people working from home was a significant decrease in air pollution and energy consumption. During the initial lockdown, CO2 emissions in the EU showed an overall decline of 49.9%, however, the levels returned to those before the pandemic after lockdown.

A similar situation was shown for other polluting gasses, such as NO2:

And other gases, such as SO2, CO, PM2.5 and PM10.

This was mostly due to a significant decrease in transportation demand (mainly less car/buses usage and less air and water traffic), and less travel in general replaced by virtual meetings or visits, as well as less need to power and maintain large office buildings and some factories. In regards to energy consumption global energy demand in early 2020 fell by 3.8%, which was the main reason for the reduction in emissions.

Having people work from home has drawn interest from certain parties, and research has been made into which professions can be feasibly done from home, and how productive is teleworking compared to in-office or on-site working. Research shows that in various countries the number of professions that can be fully done from home is around 18%.

As for productivity, results from surveys and estimates show that people employed in higher-paying jobs in richer countries are generally more productive when it comes to working from home. It has been noted that in some households men are more productive than women due to expectations of caring for children.

In conclusion, while not all jobs can be productively done from home, or at all even. There is potential for a fair part of the workforce to work from home. If this were to happen, these people would require less transportation, and office buildings would either require less power or not function at all, all of this resulting in lower emissions and energy consumption. Although the decrease won’t be anything as seen during the first lockdown, it is potentially a step towards global emission targets.

Resources:

Inclusion at COP26

COP26 has promised diversity and inclusion, signifying the importance of having everyone heard and represented, to ensure that every issue is seen and every possible solution and opinion is looked at. As stated on the COP26 website: “A priority for the COP Presidency has been ensuring an in-person and inclusive summit, because we believe that is essential to success at COP26 and delivering for our planet.

Unfortunately, it would seem that was not the case both in the blue zone where the world leaders, ministers, and other high ranking individuals gathered and discussed the future; as well as in the green zone – where public speakers, scientists, activists, youths, businesses, and others could have their voices heard.

In the blue zone, a few very important world leaders were not present: including Xi Jinping, the president of China; Vladimir Putin, the president of the Russian Federation; and Jair Bolsonaro, the president of Brazil. Which meant they did not directly participate in the talks and did not see COP26 for themselves.

Surprisingly, some officials who wished to attend, could not because of issues at COP26 itself – Energy Minister Karine Elharrar of Israel was unable to attend due to a lack of wheelchair access.

The green zone however has been host to many different people from around the world, an event that showcased this was Citizens from the Global Assembly present their proposals | #COP26. Which featured people of all walks of life from around the world. As they had shown in their map:

Despite this, all COP26 has seen a lack of representation, some individuals were unable to attend due to visa issues like Diaka Salena Koroma, who openly spoke out regarding these issues on another COP event – Earth Observers: From space frontiers to frontline farmers | #COP26. This means that many people who are generally most affected by climate change: farmers, indigenous people, minorities – are not properly heard or are not heard at all.

This has not gone unnoticed by media and the public, and hopefully, governments and global organizations will make sure that these people can speak to global leaders and organizations, and are able to actively participate in decisions for the future.

Key issues for Sustainable Food Systems and Climate Action raised at the IFIAD 2021 Annual Conference

Speakers at the 2021 IFIAD Annual Conference

On the 20th of October 2021, the IFIAD annual conference was held online, featuring 10 speakers from around the world, as well as Minister Pippa Hackett. A number of issues were raised during the conference, mainly: goals not met, insufficient trust, and lacking communication between involved parties. At the opening of the conference, it was stated that previously set goals for hunger reduction and greenhouse gas levels have not been met and humanity is currently approaching a tipping point from which it might be impossible to come back.

Additionally, the problem of communication has been raised: developing countries lack representatives, as do oppressed groups and farmers – resulting in them not being heard, despite the fact that they play a key role in both global and local food systems. Another important issue that was discussed is trust between all involved parties. Farmers need to know that they will be protected and need to be convinced to interact with other organizations more freely. Decision-making processes need to be more transparent, as one of the steps towards building trust.

Part of Maximo Torero Cullens presentation on Key Commitments and Next Steps of the UN Food Systems Summit 2021

During the conference, a lack of consensus was identified regarding a country-centric approach: in general, countries would rather take the easier technical approach and shy away from political concerns or matters of political or government power. One way to fix this is to provide evidence to governments of why this is detrimental and why simple solutions should be avoided. Other than that, it was brought up that the Food Systems Summit wasn’t all-inclusive, and food was largely excluded from COP discussions.

Issues that saw little light at the IFIAD conference but which are important at COP26 were Climate Fair Shares and Loss and Damage. Climate Fair Shares entails that rich historical polluters need to do much more regarding emission reduction and climate finance, however recently that has not been exactly the case, and this issue arguably needs more attention. Loss and Damage refers to the catastrophic loss of lands, livelihoods, and associated cultures as a result of climate change. Countries that suffer from this understandably desire compensation from the same rich historical polluters.

Heat stress predictions, most affected regions are not the primary contributors to global warming.

Sources, references and other information