{"id":220,"date":"2021-02-11T23:13:14","date_gmt":"2021-02-11T23:13:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/?p=220"},"modified":"2021-03-04T20:36:59","modified_gmt":"2021-03-04T20:36:59","slug":"circular-economy-a-new-paradigm-for-scaling-macroeconomic-resilience-livelihood-sustainability-and-carbon-neutrality-in-the-industrial-4-0-era","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/2021\/02\/11\/circular-economy-a-new-paradigm-for-scaling-macroeconomic-resilience-livelihood-sustainability-and-carbon-neutrality-in-the-industrial-4-0-era\/","title":{"rendered":"Circular Economy: A new paradigm for scaling macroeconomic resilience, livelihood sustainability and carbon neutrality in the Industrial 4.0 Era."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"What
Circular Economy and Environmental Sustainability. Source:<\/strong> LITE A\/S<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Background<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The current global trends are characterized by a complex matrix of constraints that include economic uncertainties, food insecurities, COVID-19 pandemic and tightened net-zero emission targets (for addressing the climate crisis). This calls for the development and adoption of evidence-based and policy-oriented interventions that foster sustainable and inclusive economic transitions in the Industrial 4.0 era. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The adverse impacts of the 4th<\/sup> Industrial Revolution <\/a>on environmental and livelihood sustainability is increasingly gaining traction amongst researchers, policy-makers and other industry stakeholders. The International Resources Panel<\/a> estimates that resource usage has tripled<\/a> since 1970 and could double by 2050. This can be attributed to the linearity of our economic models which are centred on a ‘take-make-use-dispose’ protocol. In total, 100 billion tons<\/a> of raw materials in the form of metals, fossil fuels, minerals, plant, and animal matter are used annually by the global economy. However, recent studies have shown that only 8.6%<\/a> of these materials are recycled. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 1:<\/strong> Linear Economy Model. Source:<\/strong> Rochester Institute of Technology<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The incorporation of the Circularity Agenda in the National Adaptation Plans (NAPs) is an urgent need since 50% of GHG emissions<\/a> are associated with material flows between mining and manufacturing processes. In the words of Dr Martin Luther King, Jr. \u2018the time is always right to do what is right\u2019. It is, therefore, imperative to establish platforms that advocate for transitions – in the direction of circularity – in the wake of climate change and its associated adverse effects. Furthermore, a shift towards a comprehensive circular economic model is necessary for minimizing environmental degradation and biodiversity loss in a way that guarantees the sustainability of future businesses. Circular Economy (CE) is the most feasible and sustainable alternative to the conventional linear economic model (Geissdoerfer et al<\/em>., 2017<\/a>; Ranta et al<\/em>., 2018)<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Circular Economy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Circularity, as defined by the European Union Commission<\/a>, is a “model of production and consumption, which involves sharing, leasing, reusing, repairing, refurbishing and recycling existing materials and products as long as possible.” The CE model sought to scale-up economic transitions through innovations in production, resource consumption, transformation and value recovery waste. Ellen MacArthur Foundation<\/a> described CE as \u201cone that is restorative by design and which aims to keep products, components, and materials at their highest utility and value at all times.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 2:<\/strong> Circular Economy Model. Source:<\/strong> Rochester Institute of Technology<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The adoption of CE on a global scale should be prioritized and promoted in order to ensure sustainability of our economic and environmental systems. Moreover, studies have reported that, CE can assist us in tackling 45%<\/a> of global GHG emissions and present an economic opportunity of US$4.5 trillion<\/a>. The EU Parliament coined and adopted the Circular Economy Action Plan<\/a> as a policy reorientation for creating a sustainable, carbon-neutral, toxic-free and entirely circular economy by 2050.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 3:<\/strong> Waste Management Hierarchy Vs Circularity<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Platform for Accelerating the Circular Economy (PACE)<\/a> which is hosted by the World Resources Institute<\/a> is a global partnership that was formed to drive action towards the adoption of the CE model. PACE’s Circular Economy Action Agenda<\/a> sheds light on how we can pivot away from linearity and move towards circularity. The agenda contains five articles: food, plastics, textiles, electronics and equipment. PACE is currently promoting the circularity agenda through various initiatives that cover the five articles in detail. In this context, PACE convened a webinar on the 4th<\/sup> of February 2021 under the caption \u2018Time to Act: The Circular Economy Action Agenda\u2019. The virtual session encompassed keynote presentations, interactive dialogues, and panel discussions covering evidence-based and sustainable pathways of integrating circular economy into the climate action agenda. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Circular Economy for Electronics<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The United Nations (UN) reports that over US$10 billion worth of metals<\/a> are disposed of annually as e-waste. Circularity for electronics prioritizes solutions that close the loop on our current \u2018take-make-use-dispose\u2019 linear model and recover value for e-waste. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 4: <\/strong> Recycling Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment. Photo Courtesy of<\/strong> BSR<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Accelerating just and fair transitions in the circular economy for electronics is dependent on the adoption of novel technological innovations and business models. Such interventions include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

a. Electronic products made from recyclable materials (for instance the Project Ara<\/a> and Fairphone<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

b. Synergistic partnerships across business systems to identify opportunities for e-waste repurposing, such as carbon fiber re-use in soccer pad making<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

c. Reverse business models that recover value from second-hand products by retrieving, servicing, and resale, such as the mobile phone take-back programmes \u2013 AT&T Trade-in Program<\/a> and Swappie<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusion<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Circularity is a restorative and decentralized concept which encourages the growth of economies that are socially and environmentally sustainable. Forging such an economic course – that is truly cyclical involves multi-stakeholder and global cooperation. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. and Hultink, E. J. (2017) ‘The Circular Economy\u2013A new sustainability paradigm?’, Journal of cleaner production,<\/em> 143, pp. 757-768.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P. and M\u00e4kinen, S. J. (2018) ‘Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A cross-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling,<\/em> 135, pp. 70-82.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Background The current global trends are characterized by a complex matrix of constraints that include economic uncertainties, food insecurities, COVID-19 pandemic and tightened net-zero emission targets (for addressing the climate crisis). This calls for the development and adoption of evidence-based and policy-oriented interventions that foster sustainable and inclusive economic transitions in the Industrial 4.0 era. … <\/p>\n

Continue reading “Circular Economy: A new paradigm for scaling macroeconomic resilience, livelihood sustainability and carbon neutrality in the Industrial 4.0 Era.”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":145,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/145"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":273,"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions\/273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.plantagbiosciences.org\/people\/noel-ndlovu\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}